linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/9] swap_info: change to array of pointers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0910152324220.4447@sister.anvils>
Date:	Thu, 15 Oct 2009 23:41:19 +0100 (BST)
From:	Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>
To:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@...a.org.au>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] swap_info: change to array of pointers

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 01:48:01 +0100 (BST)
> Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk> wrote:
> > --- si1/mm/swapfile.c	2009-10-14 21:25:58.000000000 +0100
> > +++ si2/mm/swapfile.c	2009-10-14 21:26:09.000000000 +0100
> > @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ static const char Unused_offset[] = "Unu
> >  
> >  static struct swap_list_t swap_list = {-1, -1};
> >  
> > -static struct swap_info_struct swap_info[MAX_SWAPFILES];
> > +static struct swap_info_struct *swap_info[MAX_SWAPFILES];
> >  
> 
> Could you add some comment like this ?
> ==
> nr_swapfile is never decreased.
> swap_info[type] pointer will never be invalid if it turns to be valid once.
> 
> 
> for (i = 0; i < nr_swapfiles; i++) {
> 	smp_rmp();
> 	sis = swap_info[type];
> 	....
> } 
> Then, we can execute above without checking sis is valid or not.
> smp_rmb() is required when we do above loop without swap_lock().

I do describe this (too briefly?) in the comment on smp_wmb() where
swap_info[type] is set and nr_swapfiles raised, in swapon (see below).
And make a quick same-line comment on the corresponding smp_rmb()s.

Those seem more useful to me than such a comment on the
static struct swap_info_struct *swap_info[MAX_SWAPFILES];

I was about to add (now, in writing this mail) that /proc/swaps is
the only thing that reads them without swap_lock; but that's not
true, of course, swap_duplicate and swap_free (or their helpers)
make preliminary checks without swap_lock - but the difference
there is that (unless the pagetable has become corrupted) they're
dealing with a swap entry which was previously valid, so can by
this time rely upon swap_info[type] and nr_swapfiles to be safe.

> swapon_mutex() will be no help.
> 
> Whether sis is used or not can be detelcted by sis->flags.
> 
> > @@ -1675,11 +1674,13 @@ static void *swap_start(struct seq_file
> >  	if (!l)
> >  		return SEQ_START_TOKEN;
> >  
> > -	for (i = 0; i < nr_swapfiles; i++, ptr++) {
> > -		if (!(ptr->flags & SWP_USED) || !ptr->swap_map)
> > +	for (type = 0; type < nr_swapfiles; type++) {
> > +		smp_rmb();	/* read nr_swapfiles before swap_info[type] */
> > +		si = swap_info[type];
> 
> 		if (!si) ?
> 
> > +		if (!(si->flags & SWP_USED) || !si->swap_map)
> >  			continue;
> >  		if (!--l)
> > -			return ptr;
> > +			return si;
> >  	}
...
> >  static void *swap_next(struct seq_file *swap, void *v, loff_t *pos)
> >  {
> > -	struct swap_info_struct *ptr;
> > -	struct swap_info_struct *endptr = swap_info + nr_swapfiles;
> > +	struct swap_info_struct *si = v;
> > +	int type;
> >  
> >  	if (v == SEQ_START_TOKEN)
> > -		ptr = swap_info;
> > -	else {
> > -		ptr = v;
> > -		ptr++;
> > -	}
> > +		type = 0;
> > +	else
> > +		type = si->type + 1;
> >  
> > -	for (; ptr < endptr; ptr++) {
> > -		if (!(ptr->flags & SWP_USED) || !ptr->swap_map)
> > +	for (; type < nr_swapfiles; type++) {
> > +		smp_rmb();	/* read nr_swapfiles before swap_info[type] */
> > +		si = swap_info[type];
> > +		if (!(si->flags & SWP_USED) || !si->swap_map)
...
> > @@ -1799,23 +1800,45 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(swapon, const char __use
...
> > -	if (type >= nr_swapfiles)
> > -		nr_swapfiles = type+1;
> > -	memset(p, 0, sizeof(*p));
> >  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&p->extent_list);
> > +	if (type >= nr_swapfiles) {
> > +		p->type = type;
> > +		swap_info[type] = p;
> > +		/*
> > +		 * Write swap_info[type] before nr_swapfiles, in case a
> > +		 * racing procfs swap_start() or swap_next() is reading them.
> > +		 * (We never shrink nr_swapfiles, we never free this entry.)
> > +		 */
> > +		smp_wmb();
> > +		nr_swapfiles++;
> > +	} else {
> > +		kfree(p);
> > +		p = swap_info[type];
> > +		/*
> > +		 * Do not memset this entry: a racing procfs swap_next()
> > +		 * would be relying on p->type to remain valid.
> > +		 */
> > +	}
...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/