[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091016115214.GA3159@hack>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 19:52:14 +0800
From: Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Wu Zhangjin <wuzhangjin@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@...glemail.com>,
Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tracing: convert trace_clock_local() as weak
function
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 07:38:24PM +0800, Wu Zhangjin wrote:
>trace_clock_local() is based on the arch-specific sched_clock(), in X86,
>it is tsc(64bit) based, which can give very high precision(about 1ns
>with 1GHz). but in MIPS, the sched_clock() is jiffies based, which can
>give only 10ms precison with 1000 HZ. which is not enough for tracing,
>especially for Real Time system.
>
>so, we need to implement a MIPS specific sched_clock() to get higher
>precision. There is a tsc like clock counter register in MIPS, whose
>frequency is half of the processor, so, if the cpu frequency is 800MHz,
>the time precision reaches 2.5ns, which is very good for tracing, even
>for Real Time system.
>
>but 'Cause it is only 32bit long, which will rollover quickly, so, such
>a sched_clock() will bring with extra load, which is not good for the
>whole system. so, we only need to implement a arch-specific
>trace_clock_local() for tracing. as a preparation, we convert it as a
>weak function.
>
>The MIPS specific trace_clock_local() is coming in the next patch.
>
>Signed-off-by: Wu Zhangjin <wuzhangjin@...il.com>
>---
> kernel/trace/trace_clock.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_clock.c b/kernel/trace/trace_clock.c
>index 20c5f92..a04dc18 100644
>--- a/kernel/trace/trace_clock.c
>+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_clock.c
>@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
> * Useful for tracing that does not cross to other CPUs nor
> * does it go through idle events.
> */
>-u64 notrace trace_clock_local(void)
>+u64 __attribute__((weak)) notrace trace_clock_local(void)
We have __weak.
> {
> unsigned long flags;
> u64 clock;
>--
>1.6.2.1
>
>--
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
Live like a child, think like the god.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists