[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091016153330.GB11838@loki.buserror.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 10:33:30 -0500
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, brueckner@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Timur Tabi <timur@...escale.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hvc_console: returning 0 from put_chars is not an error
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 03:46:45PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 13:57 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> > I'd say the dropping approach is quite undesirable (significant
> > potential for output loss unless the buffer is huge), unless there's
> > simply no way to safely spin. Hopefully there are no such backends, but
> > if there are perhaps we can have them return some special code to
> > indicate that.
>
> Should never spin.
Why is a hypervisor console different than a serial port in this regard?
> Best is to keep a copy in the upper layer of the pending data and throttle
> (not accept further data from tty layer) until we have managed to flush
> out that "pending" buffer.
The data isn't coming from the tty layer -- we're talking about printk. How
do you throttle that without spinning?
I agree that it shouldn't spin when handling tty I/O.
-Scott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists