[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0910161244400.6120@gentwo.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 12:45:26 -0400 (EDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
cc: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
Zhang Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [this_cpu_xx V6 7/7] this_cpu: slub aggressive use of this_cpu
operations in the hotpaths
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009, David Rientjes wrote:
> TCP_STREAM stresses a few specific caches:
>
> ALLOC_FASTPATH ALLOC_SLOWPATH FREE_FASTPATH FREE_SLOWPATH
> kmalloc-256 3868530 3450592 95628 7223491
> kmalloc-1024 2440434 429 2430825 10034
> kmalloc-4096 3860625 1036723 85571 4811779
>
> This demonstrates that freeing to full (or partial) slabs causes a lot of
> pain since the fastpath normally can't be utilized and that's probably
> beyond the scope of this patchset.
>
> It's also different from the cpu slab thrashing issue I identified with
> the TCP_RR benchmark and had a patchset to somewhat improve. The
> criticism was the addition of an increment to a fastpath counter in struct
> kmem_cache_cpu which could probably now be much cheaper with these
> optimizations.
Can you redo the patch?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists