linux-kernel - Re: [lm-sensors] lm-sensors 3.1.1-3 not detecting sensors on Intel DP55KG motherboard? (chip ID: 0xb473)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 16 Oct 2009 20:41:55 +0200
From:	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
To:	Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@...idpixels.com>
Cc:	lm-sensors@...sensors.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] lm-sensors 3.1.1-3 not detecting sensors on Intel
     DP55KG motherboard? (chip ID: 0xb473)

On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:40:51 -0400 (EDT), Justin Piszcz wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Oct 2009, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > If you want me to investigate this, you can provide an I2C dump of the
> > chip. Get i2cdump from the i2c-tools package, and then:
> >
> > # i2cdump 0 0x2c b
> >
> > This might confuse the chip in question though, so only try it if you
> > are ready to trigger a cold reboot.
> 
> Ok, luckily it does not appear to have caused any issues:
> 
> # i2cdump 0 0x2c b
> WARNING! This program can confuse your I2C bus, cause data loss and worse!
> I will probe file /dev/i2c-0, address 0x2c, mode byte
> Continue? [Y/n] y
>       0  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  a  b  c  d  e  f    0123456789abcdef
> 00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00    ................
> 10: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 80 80 80 04 7e 10    ..........????~?
> 20: 75 51 c0 c3 c3 80 28 2d bd 0f de 0f 3b 1d a9 16    uQ????(-????;???
> 30: 33 4d 4d c2 81 00 c2 00 ff ff ff e6 7b fb 41 6f    3MM??.?....?{?Ao
> 40: 35 90 40 00 00 ff 00 ff 00 ff 00 ff 00 ff 81 7f    5?@...........??
> 50: 81 7f 81 7f ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 0a a2 a2 ca    ????........????
> 60: 8a 8a e0 aa 33 4c 4c 5a 2d 2d 64 41 41 04 42 00    ????3LLZ--dAA?B.
> 70: 00 00 00 00 00 00 6c 60 f0 00 00 55 01 00 00 00    ......l`?..U?...
> 80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 ff ff 00 00 fb 64 64 64 00 00    ..........?ddd..
> 90: 00 59 59 59 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00    .YYY............
> a0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00    ................
> b0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00    ................
> c0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00    ................
> d0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00    ................
> e0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00    ................
> f0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00    ................
> #

Smells like an Analog Devices chip, but not one we know... And I can't
see it on the web site you mentioned. Please search for a small-size
chip named ADTxxxx (more likely ADT74xx).

-- 
Jean Delvare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/