[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AD7FB57.2030403@vflare.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 10:19:27 +0530
From: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>
To: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
hongshin@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] swap_info: swap count continuations
On 10/15/2009 06:26 AM, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> Swap is duplicated (reference count incremented by one) whenever the same
> swap page is inserted into another mm (when forking finds a swap entry in
> place of a pte, or when reclaim unmaps a pte to insert the swap entry).
>
> swap_info_struct's vmalloc'ed swap_map is the array of these reference
> counts: but what happens when the unsigned short (or unsigned char since
> the preceding patch) is full? (and its high bit is kept for a cache flag)
>
> We then lose track of it, never freeing, leaving it in use until swapoff:
> at which point we _hope_ that a single pass will have found all instances,
> assume there are no more, and will lose user data if we're wrong.
>
> Swapping of KSM pages has not yet been enabled; but it is implemented,
> and makes it very easy for a user to overflow the maximum swap count:
> possible with ordinary process pages, but unlikely, even when pid_max
> has been raised from PID_MAX_DEFAULT.
>
> This patch implements swap count continuations: when the count overflows,
> a continuation page is allocated and linked to the original vmalloc'ed
> map page, and this used to hold the continuation counts for that entry
> and its neighbours. These continuation pages are seldom referenced:
> the common paths all work on the original swap_map, only referring to
> a continuation page when the low "digit" of a count is incremented or
> decremented through SWAP_MAP_MAX.
>
I think the patch can be simplified a lot if we have just 2 levels (hard-coded)
of swap_map, each level having 16-bit count -- combined 32-bit count should be
sufficient for about anything. Saving 1-byte for level-1 swap_map and then having
arbitrary levels of swap_map doesn't look like its worth the complexity.
Nitin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists