linux-kernel - [patch 1/1 v2] pata_via.c : extend the rev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <C80EF34A3D2E494DBAF9AC29C7AE4EB80A1D1E6E@exchtp03.taipei.via.com.tw>
Date:	Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:45:23 +0800
From:	<JosephChan@....com.tw>
To:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <stable@...nel.org>
Cc:	<alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, <tj@...nel.org>, <jeff@...zik.org>,
	<JosephChan@....com.tw>
Subject: [patch 1/1 v2] pata_via.c : extend the rev_max for VT6330

Fix the VT6330 issue, it's because the rev_max of VT6330 exceeds 0x2f.
The VT6415 and VT6330 share the same device ID.

Signed-off-by: Joseph Chan <josephchan@....com.tw>

--- a/drivers/ata/pata_via.c	2009-10-15 23:12:49.000000000 +0800
+++ b/drivers/ata/pata_via.c	2009-10-15 23:12:57.000000000 +0800
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@
 	{ "vt8251",	PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8251,     0x00, 0x2f, VIA_UDMA_133 | VIA_BAD_AST },
 	{ "cx700",	PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_CX700,    0x00, 0x2f, VIA_UDMA_133 | VIA_BAD_AST | VIA_SATA_PATA },
 	{ "vt6410",	PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_6410,     0x00, 0x2f, VIA_UDMA_133 | VIA_BAD_AST | VIA_NO_ENABLES },
-	{ "vt6415",	PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_6415,     0x00, 0x2f, VIA_UDMA_133 | VIA_BAD_AST | VIA_NO_ENABLES },
+	{ "vt6415",	PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_6415,     0x00, 0xff, VIA_UDMA_133 | VIA_BAD_AST | VIA_NO_ENABLES },
 	{ "vt8237a",	PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8237A,    0x00, 0x2f, VIA_UDMA_133 | VIA_BAD_AST },
 	{ "vt8237",	PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8237,     0x00, 0x2f, VIA_UDMA_133 | VIA_BAD_AST },
 	{ "vt8235",	PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8235,     0x00, 0x2f, VIA_UDMA_133 | VIA_BAD_AST },