[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091017170718.GB10344@nowhere>
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 19:07:20 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@....ac.uk>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@...eenne.com>,
"Michele De Candia (VT)" <michele.decandia@...ueteam.com>,
Linux I2C <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] ALS: TSL2550 driver move from i2c/chips
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 05:56:48PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> +static int tsl2550_get_id(void)
> +{
> + int ret, val;
> +
> +idr_again:
> + if (unlikely(idr_pre_get(&tsl2550_idr, GFP_KERNEL) == 0))
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + spin_lock(&tsl2550_idr_lock);
> + ret = idr_get_new(&tsl2550_idr, NULL, &val);
> + if (unlikely(ret == -EAGAIN))
> + goto idr_again;
That looks like a fair chance to produce a deadlock
by reacquiring the above spinlock.
Also I never see the above lock released later from this
function or its caller.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists