lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ADC3C41.7000207@evidence.eu.com>
Date:	Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:15:29 +0200
From:	Claudio Scordino <claudio@...dence.eu.com>
To:	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
CC:	rmk@....linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel@....linux.org.uk
Subject: [PATCH] Default setting of the ARM_UNWIND option

[email cut-and-pasted from a private discussion...]
>>    moving from release 2.6.27 to release 2.6.32-rc4, my ARM board 
>> (derived from AT91SAM9623-EK) started hanging at the initial 
>> "Calibrating delay loop" message.
>>
>> After some inspection, I found out the problem to be with commit 
>> adf8b37bafc1495393201a2ae4235846371870d0.
>>
>> In practice, it enables stack unwinding support by default. However, if 
>> enabled, it hangs my machine.
>>
>> The problem might be with my compiler (according to the help, stack 
>> unwinding only works with EABI compilers).
>>
>> I'm using a CodeSourcery gcc 4.2.1 "arm-none-linux-gnueabi".
>>     
>
> I think 4.2.1 generates really buggy code with -fno-frame-pointer,
> nothing to do with the stack unwinding implementation in the kernel. I
> would recommend you either use a newer compiler or disables ARM_UNWIND
> in your .config (which automatically re-enables FRAMEPOINTER).
>   
Hi Catalin,

   thank you for your answer.

In my opinion, we should change the default setting of this option.

Having "yes" as default policy for ARM_UNWIND means that, by default, 
the kernel does not boot if a user has a buggy compiler (like me) and 
he/she doesn't explicitly disable the ARM_UNWIND option.

Consider that people may not know that their problem is related to the 
ARM_UNWIND option. Therefore, they may waste time just bisecting to 
understand where their problem really is.

Therefore, my suggestion is to change the default policy of this option 
as shown in the attached patch, to avoid a potential waste of time of 
developers. Users who know that they can enable this option, will enable 
it.

Let me know what you think about this suggestion.

Many thanks and my best regards,

               Claudio



View attachment "0001-Disable-stack-unwinding-support-by-default-since-it.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (1172 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ