[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ADC8677.7000607@anirban.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 08:32:07 -0700
From: Anirban Sinha <ani@...rban.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Anirban Sinha <asinha@...gmasystems.com>
Subject: Re: Kernel oops when clearing bgp neighbor info with TCP MD5SUM enabled
Once upon a time, like on 09-10-19 5:13 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Hi Anirban,
>
> On 10/18, Anirban Sinha wrote:
>>
>> I have a question for you. The queue_work() routine which is called from
>> schedule_work() does a put_cpu() which in turn does a enable_preempt(). Is
>> this an attempt to trigger the scheduler?
>
> No. please note that queue_work() does get_cpu() + put_cpu() to protect
> against cpu_down() in between.
grrr! Ah yes, my eyes failed me (or it saw what I wanted it to see :)). You do have a get_cpu() and put_cpu() together in the same code path. I guess I will have to keep looking at inet_twdr_hangman().
>> Is is
>> it illegal to schedule a work function from within a timer callback?
>
> Yes sure.
hmm. may be in that case, that function needs to be re-written.
> I'd suppose that this unbalance comes from inet_twdr_hangman() pathes.
>
> Could you verify this?
I'll keep looking. Thanks for the help Oleg.
Ani
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists