[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091019161824.GA10449@ghostprotocols.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:18:24 -0200
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ibm.com>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
systemtap <systemtap@...rces.redhat.com>,
DLE <dle-develop@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip tracing/kprobes 0/9] tracing/kprobes, perf: perf
probe and kprobe-tracer bugfixes
Em Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 01:00:57PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker escreveu:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 09:51:03AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > So, what would you think about using -D (def) and -U (undef) ?
> > The simpest case should be no extra character at all:
> > perf probe schedule
> Yeah, I really prefer that too.
/me too
> If you want more precision, it also means you have you code editor opened
> and want to set a precise point. Since you also have the absolute
> line directly displayed by your editor, you don't want to calculate the relative
> line but rather the absolute one.
Perhaps this should come with vim/emacs key bindings so that all this
gets hidden by just opening the source code and pressing
control+SOMEKEY?
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists