linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/2] perf tools: Use DECLARE_BITMAP instead of an open-coded array

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20091019194020.GC4880@nowhere>
Date:	Mon, 19 Oct 2009 21:40:23 +0200
From:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/2] perf tools: Use DECLARE_BITMAP instead of an
	open-coded array

On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 09:30:39AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 05:57:18PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > Use DECLARE_BITMAP instead of an open coded array for our bitmap
> > > of featured sections.
> > > 
> > > This makes the array an unsigned long instead of a u64 but since we 
> > > use a 256 bits bitmap, the array size shouldn't vary between 
> > > different boxes.
> > 
> > That said I would really feel more comfortable if someone can confirm 
> > that.
> 
> Should be size-invariant for the bitmap size of 256 bits due to:
> 
> #define DECLARE_BITMAP(name,bits) \
>         unsigned long name[BITS_TO_LONGS(bits)]
> 
> but it's not little-endian/big-endian invariant.
> 
> We should at minimum save the CPU architecture (and endianness 
> parameters) the data got generated on, and reject 
> endianness-incompatible uses - so that if someone wants to add 
> cross-endian support it can be implemented cleanly.
> 
> 	Ingo


Oh right, I'll add an endianness field then.

Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/