linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -tip] x86: hw-breakpoints: Actually flush thread breakpoints in flush

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 19 Oct 2009 21:48:45 +0200
From:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
Cc:	"K.Prasad" <prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] x86: hw-breakpoints: Actually flush thread
	breakpoints in flush_thread().

On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 03:25:58PM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
> Thanks. If you're setting up a tree somewhere can you let me know where
> it will be hosted? I'm pretty much done with the SH support for the
> existing topic branch in -tip, but if it's being reworked, then I'd like
> to get my changes reworked and integrated as soon as possible.


Oh you have based SH breakpoint support on top of the current breakpoint
API in -tip?

Hm, you should have talked to us about that since it's being reworked.

I'll probably post soon the rebase on top of perf events. And even if
it gets merged in -tip, it should still be considered as very unstable.

May be should you better wait for it to get upstream?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/