linux-kernel - [RFC PATCH 1/5] cfq-iosched: adapt slice to number of processes doing I/O

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200910192221.03805.czoccolo@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:21:03 +0200
From:	Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@...il.com>
To:	"Linux-Kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
	Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 1/5] cfq-iosched: adapt slice to number of processes doing I/O

When the number of processes performing I/O concurrently increases,
a fixed time slice per process will cause large latencies.

This patch, if low_latency mode is enabled,  will scale the time slice
assigned to each process according to a 300ms target latency.

In order to keep fairness among processes:
* The number of active processes is computed using a special form of
running average, that quickly follows sudden increases (to keep latency low),
and decrease slowly (to have fairness in spite of rapid decreases of this
value).

To safeguard sequential bandwidth, we impose a minimum time slice
(computed using 2*cfq_slice_idle as base, adjusted according to priority
and async-ness).

Signed-off-by: Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@...il.com>
---
 block/cfq-iosched.c |   41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/cfq-iosched.c b/block/cfq-iosched.c
index 069a610..04d3b66 100644
--- a/block/cfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/cfq-iosched.c
@@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ static const int cfq_slice_sync = HZ / 10;
 static int cfq_slice_async = HZ / 25;
 static const int cfq_slice_async_rq = 2;
 static int cfq_slice_idle = HZ / 125;
+static const int cfq_target_latency = HZ * 3/10; /* 300 ms */
+static const int cfq_hist_divisor = 4;
 
 /*
  * offset from end of service tree
@@ -134,6 +136,8 @@ struct cfq_data {
 	struct rb_root prio_trees[CFQ_PRIO_LISTS];
 
 	unsigned int busy_queues;
+	unsigned int busy_rt_queues;
+	unsigned int busy_queues_avg[2];
 
 	int rq_in_driver[2];
 	int sync_flight;
@@ -301,10 +305,37 @@ cfq_prio_to_slice(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq)
 	return cfq_prio_slice(cfqd, cfq_cfqq_sync(cfqq), cfqq->ioprio);
 }
 
+static inline unsigned
+cfq_get_avg_queues(struct cfq_data *cfqd, bool rt) {
+	unsigned min_q, max_q;
+	unsigned mult  = cfq_hist_divisor - 1;
+	unsigned round = cfq_hist_divisor / 2;
+	unsigned busy  = rt ? cfqd->busy_rt_queues :
+		(cfqd->busy_queues - cfqd->busy_rt_queues);
+	min_q = min(cfqd->busy_queues_avg[rt], busy);
+	max_q = max(cfqd->busy_queues_avg[rt], busy);
+	cfqd->busy_queues_avg[rt] = (mult * max_q + min_q + round) /
+		cfq_hist_divisor;
+	return cfqd->busy_queues_avg[rt];
+}
+
 static inline void
 cfq_set_prio_slice(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq)
 {
-	cfqq->slice_end = cfq_prio_to_slice(cfqd, cfqq) + jiffies;
+	unsigned slice = cfq_prio_to_slice(cfqd, cfqq);
+	if (cfqd->cfq_latency) {
+		unsigned iq = cfq_get_avg_queues(cfqd, cfq_class_rt(cfqq));
+		unsigned process_thr = cfqd->cfq_target_latency
+			/ cfqd->cfq_slice[1];
+		if (iq > process_thr) {
+			unsigned low_slice = 2 * slice * cfqd->cfq_slice_idle
+				/ cfqd->cfq_slice[1];
+			slice = max(slice * cfq_target_latency /
+				(cfqd->cfq_slice[1] * iq),
+				min(slice, low_slice));
+		}
+	}
+	cfqq->slice_end = jiffies + slice;
 	cfq_log_cfqq(cfqd, cfqq, "set_slice=%lu", cfqq->slice_end - jiffies);
 }
 
@@ -655,7 +686,8 @@ static void cfq_add_cfqq_rr(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq)
 	BUG_ON(cfq_cfqq_on_rr(cfqq));
 	cfq_mark_cfqq_on_rr(cfqq);
 	cfqd->busy_queues++;
-
+	if (cfq_class_rt(cfqq))
+		cfqd->busy_rt_queues++;
 	cfq_resort_rr_list(cfqd, cfqq);
 }
 
@@ -678,6 +710,8 @@ static void cfq_del_cfqq_rr(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq)
 
 	BUG_ON(!cfqd->busy_queues);
 	cfqd->busy_queues--;
+	if (cfq_class_rt(cfqq))
+		cfqd->busy_rt_queues--;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -2152,10 +2186,9 @@ static void cfq_insert_request(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq)
 	cfq_log_cfqq(cfqd, cfqq, "insert_request");
 	cfq_init_prio_data(cfqq, RQ_CIC(rq)->ioc);
 
-	cfq_add_rq_rb(rq);
-
 	rq_set_fifo_time(rq, jiffies + cfqd->cfq_fifo_expire[rq_is_sync(rq)]);
 	list_add_tail(&rq->queuelist, &cfqq->fifo);
+	cfq_add_rq_rb(rq);
 
 	cfq_rq_enqueued(cfqd, cfqq, rq);
 }
-- 
1.6.2.5


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/