[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ADCF88B.9080402@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 08:38:51 +0900
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@...hat.com>
CC: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] v5: allow userspace to adjust kvmclock offset
On 10/17/2009 04:28 AM, Glauber Costa wrote:
> When we migrate a kvm guest that uses pvclock between two hosts, we may
> suffer a large skew. This is because there can be significant differences
> between the monotonic clock of the hosts involved. When a new host with
> a much larger monotonic time starts running the guest, the view of time
> will be significantly impacted.
>
> Situation is much worse when we do the opposite, and migrate to a host with
> a smaller monotonic clock.
>
> This proposed ioctl will allow userspace to inform us what is the monotonic
> clock value in the source host, so we can keep the time skew short, and
> more importantly, never goes backwards. Userspace may also need to trigger
> the current data, since from the first migration onwards, it won't be
> reflected by a simple call to clock_gettime() anymore.
>
> +struct kvm_clock_data {
> + __u64 clock;
> + __u64 pad[2];
> +};
> +
>
The padding is not reusable without a flags word that we can set bits in
for extended functionality. Please add one (and a check that it is
zero, or -EINVAL).
Since it was already applied, please do it as an incremental patch.
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists