[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0910200847320.8658@zirkon.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 08:51:08 +0200 (CEST)
From: Michael Schmitz <schmitz@...phys.uni-duesseldorf.de>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
linux-m68k <linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: [PATCH] [RFC] ataflop: remove buggy IRQ disable from
do_fd_request()
Hi Jiri,
> > > Please elaborate a little bit more which of the two points above you base
> > > your NACK on.
> >
> > The removal of local_irq_disable() (which should have been local_irq_enable())
> > just raised a flag, and I didn't immediately see why the interrupt enable had
> > been commented out.
>
> Yes, it has been commented out in a very non-intuitive way.
That. too :-) What I meant to say - the reason why someone chose to comment out
the original sti() wasn't really clear. I guess the reason for that particular
change has been lost in the pre-git or bk era.
> > With a bit of further thought on the matter I am satisfied that this patch will
> > not impact on driver function at all, and do not wish to sustain my objection.
> >
> > IOW: Ack, and my sincere apologies for wasting your time.
>
> Thanks, I have added
>
> Acked-by: Michael Schmitz <schmitz@...phys.uni-duesseldorf.de>
>
> to the patch changelog in my tree.
That's right ...
Michael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists