[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091020065426.GN8550@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 08:54:26 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ibm.com>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
systemtap <systemtap@...rces.redhat.com>,
DLE <dle-develop@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip tracing/kprobes 0/9] tracing/kprobes, perf: perf
probe and kprobe-tracer bugfixes
* Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com> wrote:
> How about the following syntax?
> <adding>
> perf probe schedule
> perf probe --add schedule
>
> <deleting>
> perf probe --del schedule
> perf probe --del all /* delete all probepoints */
>
> So, this doesn't symmetric, but provides simple way to add a probe.
agreed. For deletion, eventually this:
perf probe --del "*"
should also work - as should other regexp (or glob) matches on a range
of existing probes.
plus there should be a perf probe call to output all current probes as
perf probe commands - so that it can be saved (and restored).
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists