lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:45:12 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_BYTES vs. CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT * Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com> wrote: > What is the reason for having these, under various conditions > disagreeing (see i386_defconfig), but supposedly redundant > auto-selected config settings? Mostly historic crappiness. Patches that clean up the situation would be welcome :) Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists