[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091020061557.GE8550@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 08:15:57 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Commit 34d76c41 causes linker errors on ia64 with NR_CPUS=4096
* Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz> wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Oct 2009, Jiri Kosina wrote:
>
> > > Commit 34d76c41 introduced the update_shares_data percpu, but it ends up
> > > causing problems on large ia64 machines. Specifically, ia64 is limited
> > > to 64k in percpu vars and with NR_CPUS=4096, that ends up being 32k by
> > > itself. It ends up causing link errors since that is how ia64 enforces
> > > the 64k limit.
> > >
> > > I can take a deeper look at finding a workable solution but thought I'd
> > > mention it in case you had ideas already.
> >
> > I am adding some IA64 CCs, as the failure is solely caused by the ia64
> > percpu implementation/pagefault handler optimization which requires the
> > .percpu section area not be larger than 64k, which blows up with 34d76c41
> > and NR_CPUS high enoufh (due to introduction of percpu array being
> > size-dependent on NR_CPUS).
>
> How about this one? (untested)
>
>
>
> From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
> Subject: sched: move rq_weight data array out of .percpu
>
> Commit 34d76c41 introduced percpu array update_shares_data, size of which
> being proportional to NR_CPUS. Unfortunately this blows up ia64 for large
> NR_CPUS configuration, as ia64 allows only 64k for .percpu section.
>
> Fix this by allocating this array dynamically and keep only pointer to it
> percpu.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
> ---
> kernel/sched.c | 15 +++++++--------
> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Seems like an IA64 bug to me. It's _very_ easy to get more than 64K of
percpu data - i'm wondering why IA64 only triggered it now? Sure
lockdep/lockstat must have triggered it before.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists