[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091021173514.GA32227@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 19:35:14 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>
Cc: Thomas Schlichter <thomas.schlichter@....de>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>,
Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@...il.com>,
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org,
Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@...are.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch] use MTRR for write combining if PAT is not
available
* Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com> wrote:
> > So if it's OK for Jan, I'll reduce the functionality again and use
> > mtrr_add() instead. Btw. this simply means to drop
> > mtrr_add_unaligned(), all the other parts are still required for
> > reference counting and a proper mtrr_del() on file close.
>
> I'm perfectly fine with just handling the aligned case, as long as the
> code checks that the alignment constraints are met.
It could even emit a debug warning if they are not met - that way we'll
see how important the unaligned case is.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists