[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091021114210.4d7e1ea9@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:42:10 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc: discuss@...sWatts.org, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Corey Minyard <minyard@....org>,
openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipmi: use round_jiffies on timers to reduce timer
overhead/wakeups
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 10:28:22 -0700
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote:
> From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
>
> Use a round_jiffies() variant to reduce overhead of timer
> wakeups. This causes the ipmi timers to occur at the same
> time as other timers (per CPU).
>
> Typical powertop for /ipmi/ (2.6.31, before patch):
> 11.4% (247.4) kipmi0 : __mod_timer (process_timeout)
> 0.6% ( 13.1) <interrupt> : ipmi_si
> 0.5% ( 10.0) <kernel core> : __mod_timer (ipmi_timeout)
>
> powertop for /ipmi/, 2.6.31, after patch:
> 10.8% (247.6) kipmi0 : __mod_timer (process_timeout)
> 0.3% ( 6.9) <interrupt> : ipmi_si
> 0.0% ( 1.0) <kernel core> : __mod_timer (ipmi_timeout)
while it is nice that ipmi_si ande the timer wake up less now.... it's
still rather sad that the 247.6 from kipmi0 are still there..... those
are a much much bigger issue
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists