[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1256152779-10054-39-git-send-email-vaurora@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 12:19:36 -0700
From: Valerie Aurora <vaurora@...hat.com>
To: Jan Blunck <jblunck@...e.de>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
Scott James Remnant <scott@...onical.com>,
Sandu Popa Marius <sandupopamarius@...il.com>,
Jan Rekorajski <baggins@...h.mimuw.edu.pl>,
"J. R. Okajima" <hooanon05@...oo.co.jp>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Vladimir Dronnikov <dronnikov@...il.com>,
Felix Fietkau <nbd@...nwrt.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 38/41] union-mount: Make pivot_root work with union mounts
When moving a union mount, follow it down to the bottom layer and move
that instead of just the top layer.
Signed-off-by: Valerie Aurora <vaurora@...hat.com>
---
fs/namespace.c | 9 +++++++++
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/namespace.c b/fs/namespace.c
index 9b71743..6ac5fc1 100644
--- a/fs/namespace.c
+++ b/fs/namespace.c
@@ -2282,6 +2282,15 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(pivot_root, const char __user *, new_root,
if (d_unlinked(old.dentry))
goto out2;
error = -EBUSY;
+ /*
+ * follow_union_down() only goes one layer down. We want the
+ * bottom-most layer here - if we move that around, all the
+ * layers on top move with it. But if we ever allow more than
+ * two layers, the below two will both need to be in while()
+ * loops.
+ */
+ follow_union_down(&new.mnt, &new.dentry);
+ follow_union_down(&root.mnt, &root.dentry);
if (new.mnt == root.mnt ||
old.mnt == root.mnt)
goto out2; /* loop, on the same file system */
--
1.6.3.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists