[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091021222758.GG4880@nowhere>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:27:59 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arndbergmann@...glemail.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sony_pi: Remove the BKL from sonypi_misc_open
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 12:06:32AM +0200, John Kacur wrote:
> Okay, I'm sure there is something wrong in this methodology, but it's late
> at night. At least for a ballpark figure, hopefully it's right.
>
> Files that mentions "file_operations" -
> Files that mention "file_operations" and mention "llseek"
> = 1172 - 596 = 572 (in my particular git repo)
>
> So, over 550 files that need to be set to no_llseek, locked_llseek, or
> unlocked_llseek. Yikes!
>
> [jkacur@...ho rt.linux.git]$ git-grep -l file_operations | grep -v
> Documentation | wc -l
> 1172
> [jkacur@...ho rt.linux.git]$ git-grep -l llseek $(git-grep -l
> file_operations | grep -v Documentation) | wc -l
> 596
>
So much?
Ok, a default_lseek pushdown patch wouldn't be accepted :)
Well, I guess we first need to fix the sites that explicitly use the
bkl, one by one, and after that probably propose a new locked version but
without the bkl...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists