linux-kernel - Re: [ntp:hackers] ntp-dev-4.2.5p235-RC build failure: MOD

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200910212303.n9LN3vFt000507@deneb.dwf.com>
Date:	Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:03:57 -0600
From:	Reg Clemens <reg@....com>
To:	john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
cc:	James Cloos <cloos@...loos.com>,
	davehart_gmail_exchange_tee@...ehart.net, hackers@...ts.ntp.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, reg@...eb.dwf.com
Subject: Re: [ntp:hackers] ntp-dev-4.2.5p235-RC build failure: MOD_NANO not 
 #defined


Isnt it just time to get rid of these MOD_ constructs in ntp?

A quick find/grep of the code shows that there are only 7 usages left
in the ntpd main line.

There are 2 in tickadj.

There are 15 in ntptime.

It would take less time to change these to the STA_*** forms than
to see this question ever come up again.

-- 
                                        Reg.Clemens
                                        reg@....com


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/