linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] binfmt_elf: Reorder objects in Makefile to favor platform default.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0910210346110.19091@andre.icculuslan>
Date:	Wed, 21 Oct 2009 03:59:10 -0400 (EDT)
From:	"Ryan C. Gordon" <icculus@...ulus.org>
To:	Andreas Schwab <schwab@...hat.com>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] binfmt_elf: Reorder objects in Makefile to favor platform
 default.

> > Perhaps this should be configurable.  For a 64-bit arch with mostly
> > 32-bit userspace the compat format should probably be tried first.
> 
> How about this, then?

I didn't realize that commit 74641f584da8eccf30becfbb5507ab457187db22 
changed the behaviour of register_binfmt, so the previous patch had it 
backwards. Here's an updated patch with the order corrected to match the 
config option; no other changes over the previous attempt.

>From 78c3a0bb3025fa6b6a31b259b49663a72a59a1bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ryan C. Gordon <icculus@...ulus.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 03:49:30 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] binfmt_elf: Reordered object list so compat_binfmt_elf optionally comes first.

This will make it call register_binfmt() after normal binfmt_elf, inserting it
at the end of the list of binfmts.

Now the kernel will try the compatibility formats as a backup if the actual
system format rejects the binary. As almost all binaries loaded won't be
compatibility formats, this saves a few cycles for each process.

For scenarios where favoring compatibility binaries makes sense, this can
be chosen via the configuration, reversing the order.

Signed-off-by: Ryan C. Gordon <icculus@...ulus.org>
---
 fs/Kconfig.binfmt |   14 ++++++++++++++
 fs/Makefile       |    7 +++++++
 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/Kconfig.binfmt b/fs/Kconfig.binfmt
index bb4cc5b..b296ab6 100644
--- a/fs/Kconfig.binfmt
+++ b/fs/Kconfig.binfmt
@@ -27,6 +27,20 @@ config COMPAT_BINFMT_ELF
 	bool
 	depends on COMPAT && BINFMT_ELF

+config FAVOR_COMPAT_BINFMT_ELF
+	bool "Favor compatibility ELF binaries"
+	depends on COMPAT_BINFMT_ELF
+	default n
+	---help---
+	  Favor "compatibility" ELF binaries. The system will work either way,
+	  but you can save a few cycles per process by choosing the type of
+	  binary you expect to be loading most of the time. This scenario 
+	  makes sense if you have a 64-bit kernel to manage 4+ gigabytes of
+	  physical RAM but want to run mostly 32-bit processes to conserve
+	  that RAM.
+
+	  If unsure, say N.
+
 config BINFMT_ELF_FDPIC
 	bool "Kernel support for FDPIC ELF binaries"
 	default y
diff --git a/fs/Makefile b/fs/Makefile
index af6d047..d835dba 100644
--- a/fs/Makefile
+++ b/fs/Makefile
@@ -40,8 +40,15 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_BINFMT_MISC)	+= binfmt_misc.o
 # binfmt_script is always there
 obj-y				+= binfmt_script.o

+# binfmts are registered in order listed here. First registered, first tried!
+ifeq ($(CONFIG_FAVOR_COMPAT_BINFMT_ELF),y)
+obj-$(CONFIG_COMPAT_BINFMT_ELF)	+= compat_binfmt_elf.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_BINFMT_ELF)	+= binfmt_elf.o
+else
 obj-$(CONFIG_BINFMT_ELF)	+= binfmt_elf.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_COMPAT_BINFMT_ELF)	+= compat_binfmt_elf.o
+endif
+
 obj-$(CONFIG_BINFMT_ELF_FDPIC)	+= binfmt_elf_fdpic.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_BINFMT_SOM)	+= binfmt_som.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_BINFMT_FLAT)	+= binfmt_flat.o
-- 
1.6.0.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/