[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200910212341.06025.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 23:41:03 +1030
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Problems with string (charp) module parameters
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:07:46 pm Takashi Iwai wrote:
> While I tried to add some debug option to a driver, I found that a module
> parameter taking a string (charp) gives Oops when set via sysfs:
Hi Takashi,
Always nice to receive a good analysis like this: thanks!
> * Each struct kernel_param instance is defined as const, and is put
> into __param section, which is read-only.
> I guess this causes the page fault above. And...
Ah yes, that's bad, but we could fix that.
> * The above NULL check is invalid. It should be
> if (!*(char **)kp->arg)
> return -ENOMEM
> This is easy, however...
Good spotting.
> * The handling of parameter array is pretty buggy now.
> kp->perm and kp->flags aren't properly initialized in
> param_array(). Thus, you might call kfree() with invalid pointers,
> or pass a wrong type for bool.
Yes, an array of charp isn't going to work. Erk, I switched one bug for
another :(
> So, the situation looks messy right now, not only about the section
> issue. If we allow kmalloc of each parameter array element, the flag
> must be associated to each element, not a global one to the array.
>
> Thoughts?
Yes, that's hard. There's only one place which currently has a writable
array parameter: drivers/usb/atm/ueagle-atm.c, and it's root only.
OK, for 2.6.32, we remove the const. In the longer term, I'm reworking how
this is done entirely.
Thanks!
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists