[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1256244726.20866.802.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:52:06 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Adam Nemet <anemet@...iumnetworks.com>
Cc: David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>, wuzhangjin@...il.com,
Richard Sandiford <rdsandiford@...glemail.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@...r.at>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v4 4/9] tracing: add static function tracer support
for MIPS
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 13:30 -0700, Adam Nemet wrote:
> Maybe scanning the instructions should stop at the beginning of the function
> based on the kernel's symbol table. I am not sure if we can establish any
> other stopping condition without affecting performance too much.
How would we check the kernel symbol table? Remember, this happens at
_every_ function call.
>
> Speaking of performance, -pg also affects the instruction scheduling freedom
> of the compiler in the prologue. With profiling, we limit optimizations not
> to move instructions in and out of the prologue.
>
> Also note that for functions invoked via tail call you won't get an exit
> event. E.g. if bar is tail-called from foo:
>
> foo entered
> bar entered
> foo/bar exited
>
> However, this is not MIPS-specific and you can always disable tail calls
> with -fno-optimize-sibling-calls.
The question is, would bar have a _mcount call? So far, we have not had
any issues with this on either x86 nor PPC.
/me knocks on wood.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists