[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091023081047.4d8abc29@jbarnes-x200>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 08:10:47 +0900
From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Cc: Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>,
Thomas Schlichter <thomas.schlichter@....de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>,
Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@...il.com>,
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>,
"Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
"dri-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net" <dri-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@...are.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch] use MTRR for write combining if PAT is not
available
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 14:47:30 -0700
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 08:34 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > Can we just not create the _wc sysfs entry if we don't have PAT? I
> > don't think there's userland relying on its presence as opposed to
> > the non-_wc entry.
>
> Yes indeed. Jesse do you see an issue with this? This is simple and
> clean. Thanks Eric.
Yeah, I think that will be fine. In fact, older versions of
libpciaccess will behave better if we do it that way (iirc it only
allocates an MTRR if the resource_wc file doesn't exist or fails to get
mapped).
Jesse
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists