linux-kernel - Re: request_module vs. modprobe blacklist (and security subsystem implications)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 22 Oct 2009 02:48:10 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, arjan@...radead.org,
	randy.dunlap@...cle.com, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
	andi@...stfloor.org, dhowells@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: request_module vs. modprobe blacklist (and security subsystem implications)

> The problem is that a number of programs (sendmail, procmail, sshd, and
> more) have all been seen to do operations which tried to load the ipv6
> module.  These get into request_module(), hit the security hook, and are
> obviously denied since the security system doesn't see a need for those
> programs to be able to request a module be loaded.

What's the problem with being denied? After all the programs expect
this to error out

If you're worrying about the audit entries -- the obvious place
to fix that is somewhere in your security code. Don't make the rest
of the code uglier for this.

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/