linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH resend] block: silently error unsupported empty barriers too

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20091023204044.GA29173@redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 23 Oct 2009 16:40:44 -0400
From:	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
To:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	device-mapper development <dm-devel@...hat.com>
Cc:	Mark McLoughlin <markmc@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
	Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend] block: silently error unsupported empty barriers
 too

On Thu, Sep 03 2009 at 11:47am -0400,
Mark McLoughlin <markmc@...hat.com> wrote:

> With 2.6.31-rc5 in a KVM guest using dm and virtio_blk, we see the
> following errors:
> 
>   end_request: I/O error, dev vda, sector 0
>   end_request: I/O error, dev vda, sector 0
> 
> The errors go away if dm stops submitting empty barriers, by reverting:
> 
>   commit 52b1fd5a27c625c78373e024bf570af3c9d44a79
>   Author: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
>     dm: send empty barriers to targets in dm_flush
> 
> We should error all barriers, even empty barriers, on devices like
> virtio_blk which don't support them.
> 
> See also:
> 
>   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/514901
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@...hat.com>
> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
> Cc: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
> Cc: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com>
> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
> ---
>  block/blk-core.c |    3 +--
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
> index e3299a7..35ad2bb 100644
> --- a/block/blk-core.c
> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
> @@ -1163,8 +1163,7 @@ static int __make_request(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
>  	const int unplug = bio_unplug(bio);
>  	int rw_flags;
>  
> -	if (bio_barrier(bio) && bio_has_data(bio) &&
> -	    (q->next_ordered == QUEUE_ORDERED_NONE)) {
> +	if (bio_barrier(bio) && (q->next_ordered == QUEUE_ORDERED_NONE)) {
>  		bio_endio(bio, -EOPNOTSUPP);
>  		return 0;
>  	}

Jens,

Any chance we can get this fix upstream for 2.6.32?  I refreshed the
patch to work on 2.6.32-rc5:


From: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@...hat.com>

With 2.6.32-rc5 in a KVM guest using dm and virtio_blk, we see the
following errors:

  end_request: I/O error, dev vda, sector 0
  end_request: I/O error, dev vda, sector 0

The errors go away if dm stops submitting empty barriers, by reverting:

  commit 52b1fd5a27c625c78373e024bf570af3c9d44a79
  Author: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
    dm: send empty barriers to targets in dm_flush

We should silently error all barriers, even empty barriers, on devices
like virtio_blk which don't support them.

See also:

  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/514901

Signed-off-by: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
---
 block/blk-core.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index ac0fa10..71da511 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -1161,7 +1161,7 @@ static int __make_request(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
	const unsigned int ff = bio->bi_rw & REQ_FAILFAST_MASK;
	int rw_flags;
 
-	if (bio_rw_flagged(bio, BIO_RW_BARRIER) && bio_has_data(bio) &&
+	if (bio_rw_flagged(bio, BIO_RW_BARRIER) &&
	    (q->next_ordered == QUEUE_ORDERED_NONE)) {
		bio_endio(bio, -EOPNOTSUPP);
		return 0;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/