[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1eiotogbw.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 16:12:19 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Oren Laadan <orenl@...rato.com>
Cc: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
randy.dunlap@...cle.com, arnd@...db.de, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Nathan Lynch <nathanl@...tin.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Louis.Rilling@...labs.com,
kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...e.hu,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>, roland@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][v8][PATCH 0/10] Implement clone3() system call
Oren Laadan <orenl@...rato.com> writes:
> I stand corrected by Suka: a pid-specific clone does not change
> last_pid. Therefore, given that 'restart' only creates tasks with
> pid-specific clone, this should be safe for c/r.
Exactly. We can preserve the existing guarantees and keep the ability
to restore any pid (at least in a fresh pid namespace).
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists