linux-kernel - [performance problem] CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE: Increased kernel build times

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20091023074533.GA10067@elte.hu>
Date:	Fri, 23 Oct 2009 09:45:33 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: [performance problem] CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE: Increased kernel
	build times

Steve,

i did an 64-bit allyesconfig build test (with debug_info disabled), with 
and without CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE set.

The build time results are:

  -CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE:   266.30
  +CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE:   296.07 (+11.2%)

So we get more than 10% build time overhead.

That's quite high - higher than what i remember having measured 
originally when the first iteration of the mcount code went in.

This extra overhead comes from the mcount post-processing script 
(scripts/recordmcount.pl) that runs objcopy as well and is written in 
Perl. I think this whole angle needs to be improved - 10% is way too 
high of a price to pay.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/