lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 24 Oct 2009 21:43:31 +0200
From:	Sam Ravnborg <>
To:	Stefan Richter <>
Cc:	Theodore Tso <>, Ingo Molnar <>,
	Steven Rostedt <>,
	LKML <>,
	Nicolas Pitre <>,
	"Luck, Tony" <>,
	Stephen Rothwell <>,
	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <>,
	Jeff Garzik <>,
	Robert Richter <>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <>,
	Jean Delvare <>,
	Linus Torvalds <>
Subject: Re: [RFC] to rebase or not to rebase on linux-next

> We should rely less on linux-next as a cross-compile farm; that's not
> its purpose.  We can cross-compile ourselves.

Hmm, last time I tried to build binutils/gcc I only got:
   alpha arm sparc64 i386 x86_64 um m68k


I recall that I managed to build sh and avr32 alas no luck.
So please do not expect people that touches code impacting
lots of architectures to provide the same level of coverage
that -next does.

Hay - and sometimes I even fail to buil for all the architectures
I have build tool for.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists