[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091024194331.GA6234@merkur.ravnborg.org>
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 21:43:31 +0200
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
Cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...il.com>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] to rebase or not to rebase on linux-next
>
> We should rely less on linux-next as a cross-compile farm; that's not
> its purpose. We can cross-compile ourselves.
Hmm, last time I tried to build binutils/gcc I only got:
alpha arm sparc64 i386 x86_64 um m68k
working.
I recall that I managed to build sh and avr32 alas no luck.
So please do not expect people that touches code impacting
lots of architectures to provide the same level of coverage
that -next does.
Hay - and sometimes I even fail to buil for all the architectures
I have build tool for.
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists