[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091024033839.GA16430@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 20:38:39 -0700
From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>,
Oren Laadan <orenl@...rato.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...e.fr>,
randy.dunlap@...cle.com, arnd@...db.de, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Nathan Lynch <nathanl@...tin.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Louis.Rilling@...labs.com,
kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...e.hu,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>, roland@...hat.com,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][v8][PATCH 0/10] Implement clone3() system call
Eric W. Biederman [ebiederm@...ssion.com] wrote:
| > +static int set_pidmap(struct pid_namespace *pid_ns, int target)
| > +{
| > + if (!target)
| > + return alloc_pidmap(pid_ns);
BTW, we need this now that the RESERVED_PIDS check is is conditional on
->last_pid. But this makes set_pidmap() completely general so should we
have alloc_pid() call set_pidmap() always ? Or we could move this check
into alloc_pid(), but it may be better to have all values of 'target'
checked in one place.
| > +
| > + if (target >= pid_max)
| > + return -EINVAL;
| > +
| > + if ((target < 0) || (target < RESERVED_PIDS && pid_ns == &init_pid_ns))
| > + return -EINVAL;
|
| if ((target < 0) || ((target < RESERVED_PIDS) && (pid_ns->last_pid >= RESERVED_PIDS)))
|
| Please.
Ok.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists