[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091024085848.GA23215@elte.hu>
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 10:58:48 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Naohiro Ooiwa <nooiwa@...aclelinux.com>
Cc: roland@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, oleg@...hat.com,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, h-shimamoto@...jp.nec.com,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] show message when exceeded rlimit of pending signals
* Naohiro Ooiwa <nooiwa@...aclelinux.com> wrote:
> Hi Ingo, Roland,
>
> Now, I received a nice comment from OGAWA-san.
> How is this impriment like a print_faital_signal().
>
> I think it's very nice.
Agreed - i just wanted to suggest that too. print_fatal_signals is
already a switch that turns on warnings about 'weird looking signal
behavior'. print-on-overflow seems like a good match.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists