linux-kernel - Re: Irq architecture for multi-core network driver.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20091024.062339.83445567.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Sat, 24 Oct 2009 06:23:39 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	ddaney@...iumnetworks.com
Cc:	cfriesen@...tel.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org
Subject: Re: Irq architecture for multi-core network driver.

From: David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:24:24 -0700

> Certainly this is one mode of operation that should be supported, but
> I would also like to be able to go for raw throughput and have as many
> cores as possible reading from a single queue (like I currently have).

You can't do this, at least within the same flow, since as you even
mention in your original posting this can result in packet reordering
which we must avoid as much as is possible.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/