| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4AE4E026.9070402@mandriva.org> Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 01:32:54 +0200 From: Thomas Backlund <tmb@...driva.org> To: Robert Bradbury <robert.bradbury@...il.com> CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: RFC: Updating the LKML bug reporting/updating framework Robert Bradbury wrote: > Now, the LKML seems to to be a throwback almost to 1971 when the first > email messages were sent between a couple of PDP-10s. It has patches > that I have no interest in, discussions I have no interest in and were > it not for Gmail's search function it would be generally useless (very > high Noise-to-Signal ratio). Now maybe I do not understand the Linux > development process. Maybe this is a "Wizard of Oz" case and there is > a hidden bug reporting system hidden behind the curtain -- but in > spite of my best efforts I cannot locate it. You didn't read http://www.kernel.org/ ?? There is a nice section on the first page stating: Reporting Linux Kernel bugs Please see http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/docs/lkml/reporting-bugs.html if you want to report a Linux kernel bug. Bug reports sent to the kernel.org administrators will be ignored. There is now a bugzilla setup at bugzilla.kernel.org. Currently this is for reporting kernel version 2.6 bugs only. -- Thomas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists