| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20091025101118.522a7aa4@infradead.org> Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 10:11:18 -0700 From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> Cc: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>, Tigran Aivazian <tigran@...azian.fsnet.co.uk>, Mike Travis <travis@....com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org, Andreas Mohr <andi@...as.de>, Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>, Hannes Eder <hannes@...neseder.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] SGI x86_64 UV: Limit the number of microcode messages On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 17:37:04 +0100 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote: > > Having the precise microcode version printed (or exposed somewhere in > /sys) is useful - sometimes when there's a weird crash in some > prototype CPU one of the first questions from hw vendors is 'which > precise microcode version was that?'. something like /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/microcode/version ? (yes that is there today ;-) -- Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists