linux-kernel - Re: [Alacrityvm-devel] [KVM PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: export lockless GSI attribute

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4AE5A336.4010801@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 26 Oct 2009 09:25:10 -0400
From:	Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins@...il.com>
To:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
CC:	Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	alacrityvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Alacrityvm-devel] [KVM PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: export lockless GSI
 attribute

Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 10/23/2009 04:38 AM, Gregory Haskins wrote:
>> Certain GSI's support lockless injecton, but we have no way to detect
>> which ones at the GSI level.  Knowledge of this attribute will be
>> useful later in the series so that we can optimize irqfd injection
>> paths for cases where we know the code will not sleep.  Therefore,
>> we provide an API to query a specific GSI.
>>
>>    
> 
> Instead of a lockless attribute, how about a ->set_atomic() method.  For 
> msi this can be the same as ->set(), for non-msi it can be a function 
> that schedules the work (which will eventually call ->set()).
> 
> The benefit is that we make a decision only once, when preparing the 
> routing entry, and install that decision in the routing entry instead of 
> making it again and again later.

Yeah, I like this idea.  I think we can also get rid of the custom
workqueue if we do this as well, TBD.

> 
>> +int kvm_irq_check_lockless(struct kvm *kvm, u32 irq)
>>    
> 
> bool kvm_irq_check_lockless(...)

We lose the ability to detect failure (such as ENOENT) if we do this,
but its moot if we move to the ->set_atomic() model, since this
attribute is no longer necessary and this patch can be dropped.

Kind Regards,
-Greg


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (268 bytes)