[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1256565667.26028.257.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:01:07 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Wu Zhangjin <wuzhangjin@...il.com>
Cc: linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@...r.at>,
Richard Sandiford <rdsandiford@...glemail.com>,
David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>,
Adam Nemet <anemet@...iumnetworks.com>,
Patrik Kluba <kpajko79@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v5 02/11] MIPS: add mips_timecounter_read() to get
high precision timestamp
On Sun, 2009-10-25 at 23:16 +0800, Wu Zhangjin wrote:
> This patch implement a mips_timecounter_read(), which can be used to get
> high precision timestamp without extra lock.
>
> It is based on the clock counter register and the
> timecounter/cyclecounter abstraction layer of kernel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wu Zhangjin <wuzhangjin@...il.com>
> ---
> arch/mips/include/asm/time.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> arch/mips/kernel/csrc-r4k.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/mips/kernel/time.c | 2 ++
Some patches touch core tracing code, and some are arch specific. Now
the question is how do we go. I prefer that we go the path of the
tracing tree (easier for me to test). But every patch that touches MIPS
arch, needs an Acked-by from the MIPS maintainer. Which I see is Ralf
(on the Cc of this patch set.)
Thanks,
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists