[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1256578064.1865.96.camel@Joe-Laptop.home>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:27:44 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Marti Raudsepp <marti@...fo.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] scripts/get_maintainer.pl: also find maintainers from
Mercurial (hg log)
On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 18:04 +0200, Marti Raudsepp wrote:
> Hi!
Hi Marti.
> Given that there are official hg repositories available from kernel.org,
> Mercurial seems to be an acceptable alternative to git.
> Does this patch have any chance?
The idea is fine by me.
Here are a couple of things to consider:
There are a few outstanding patches to get_maintainer
so this doesn't apply to latest, but it's not problem
to fix it up.
What about using hg annotate for the git blame?
hg annotate -c $file
and
hg annotate --template="{desc}\n" -r $rev
Is there an hg annotate select line range capability?
I'm not a user of hg. I did:
hg clone http://www.kernel.org/hg/linux-2.6/
and
hg annotate -c -l README
and the output line numbering style isn't clear to me.
Maybe it's better not to introduce more arguments.
Would it be acceptable to use --git instead of --hg
and just execute hg if .git wasn't available but .hg
was? Basically just consider --git the equivalent of
--vcs and execute whatever vcs system was supported?
Or maybe just add --vcs instead of --hg so that
the perforce/cvs/svn/darcs/VisualSourceSafe/etc users
could be happy in the future too...
What do you think?
cheers, Joe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists