[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091026171330.GC6317@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:13:30 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
dipankar@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, josh@...htriplett.org,
dvhltc@...ibm.com, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
dhowells@...hat.com, avi@...hat.com, mtosatti@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 6/6] rcu: Simplify creating of lockdep
class for root rcu_node
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 07:50:07AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >
> > Use lockdep_set_class() to simplify the code and to avoid any additional
> > overhead in the !LOCKDEP case.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> This signoff order is wrong - first signoff line must be the author of
> the patch. (which is a pretty general rule with only rare exceptions)
>
> This patch was from Peter originally, right? In such cases please add:
>
> From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
>
> To the head of the patch. Or, if Peter acked it, add:
>
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
>
> SOB lines are strictly only added by people who send patches to you -
> i.e. it records the patch handling pathway.
I will resubmit with this fixed up, apologies for my confusion.
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists