lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:13:30 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <>
To:	Ingo Molnar <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 6/6] rcu: Simplify creating of lockdep
	class for root rcu_node

On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 07:50:07AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Paul E. McKenney <> wrote:
> > From: Paul E. McKenney <>
> > 
> > Use lockdep_set_class() to simplify the code and to avoid any additional
> > overhead in the !LOCKDEP case.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <>
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <>
> This signoff order is wrong - first signoff line must be the author of 
> the patch. (which is a pretty general rule with only rare exceptions) 
> This patch was from Peter originally, right? In such cases please add:
>   From: Peter Zijlstra <>
> To the head of the patch. Or, if Peter acked it, add:
>   Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <>
> SOB lines are strictly only added by people who send patches to you - 
> i.e. it records the patch handling pathway.

I will resubmit with this fixed up, apologies for my confusion.

							Thanx, Paul
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists