[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AE5DC80.8010204@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:29:36 -0700
From: Sunil Mushran <sunil.mushran@...cle.com>
To: Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>
CC: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.com>, ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 1/2] fiemap: Add new extent flag FIEMAP_EXTENT_SHARED
Jamie Lokier wrote:
> It might be better to have a flag FIEMAP_EXTENT_NOT_SHARED.
>
> Apps which need to know the data is not shared can't safely check
> !(flags & FIEMAP_EXTENT_SHARED) because of old kernels which don't set
> the flag.
I'm probably not understanding your point. Won't the older kernels not set
FIEMAP_EXTENT_NOT_SHARED too.
If this is important, we could always add this flag in the stable kernel
trees. Both sharing of extents and fiemap are relatively new to the kernel.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists