[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1256579869.8576.7.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:57:49 -0400
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
jamie@...reable.org
Subject: Re: symlinks with permissions
On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 18:46 +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> That's what I'd think as well but it does not as I've just learned and
> tested :) proc_pid_follow_link actually directly gives a dentry of the
> target file without checking permissions on the way.
>
> Honza
I seem to remember that is deliberate, the point being that a symlink
in /proc/*/fd/ may contain a path that refers to a private namespace.
Cheers
Trond
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists