[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AE5E4D3.6060404@sgi.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:05:07 -0700
From: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
To: rostedt@...dmis.org
CC: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Robin Getz <rgetz@...log.com>,
Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] SGI x86_64 UV: Add limit console output function
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 08:02 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
>> Also more work could be done to make CPU boot up less verbose without
>> sacrifying debuggability if something goes wrong.
>
> What about moving printks over to trace_printk or something. And that
> way we can have a "boot up" ring buffer that can later be retrieved if
> something goes wrong. It already dumps to the console on panic/oops.
>
> The trace_printk will be hidden and is very fast.
>
> -- Steve
>
I haven't heard of "trace_printk" but how does this differ from the
existing kernel log buffer you get with 'dmesg'?
Thanks,
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists