[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091026182304.GB4657@srcf.ucam.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:23:04 +0000
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To: Robert Bradbury <robert.bradbury@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Broken ondemand scheduler in Linux 2.6.30+ on Pentium IVs
...except that conservative has the same latency threshold as ondemand,
which I'm sure wasn't supposed to be the case. I've added the cpufreq
list to Cc:.
(Summary: p4-clockmod had its latency changed to avoid ondemand using
it, which was done to avoid the performance impact that ondemand
generates on p4s. I thought that conservative was still supposed to work
here, but as it has the same latency threshold it doesn't)
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists