linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] strip: move driver to staging

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:07:43 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] strip: move driver to staging

On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 11:48 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 06:24:34PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Anyway, for moving to staging, TODO file describing what needs to be
> > fixed before it is brought back was listed as a requirement.
> 	- A maintainer is needed to take ownership of this driver and
> 	  they must be willing to maintain and test any future api
> 	  changes needed.

There are a lot of files in the tree without assigned maintainers.
(want a list? ;)

I think adding a requirement that files have maintainers before
being added to not-staging is not a good thing.

It is likely that strip could have be deleted without anyone caring.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/