lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 26 Oct 2009 16:30:50 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <>
Subject: Re: [RFC] to rebase or not to rebase on linux-next

From: Steven Rostedt <>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:26:28 -0400

> I think this is more of a failure in git than in the work flow we
> present.

Others (like me) will say you should have let that patch cook for a
while on the mailing list or in your tree before publishing, in order
to let those acks and tested-by replies come in.

That's how I handle this.

And I really don't buy the argument that you have to publish the
change in a GIT tree to get those ACKs and tested-by replies.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists