[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091026074126.GA6187@ff.dom.local>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 07:41:26 +0000
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc: Tilman Schmidt <tilman@...p.cc>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, hidave.darkstar@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-ppp@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, paulus@...ba.org,
Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>,
Oliver Hartkopp <oliver@...tkopp.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Adjust softirq raising in __napi_schedule
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 04:46:31PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 16:39 +0200, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
>
> > Strange. Then what are the two separate functions netif_rx() and
> > netif_rx_ni() for?
>
> netif_rx_ni() disables preemption.
You wrote earlier:
> [...] the networking layer needs to have
> packets handed to it with softirqs disabled.
How disabling preemption can fix something which needs softirqs
disabled? Could you be more precise?
> > > This really should be obvious. You're fixing the warning at the source
> > > of the warning, rather than the source of the problem.
> >
> > Good idea. So please do tell us where the source of the problem is.
>
> You use netif_rx_ni() instead of netif_rx() at whatever place that
> causes this problem.
This isn't a very precise description either.
Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists