[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091026075438.GB6187@ff.dom.local>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 07:54:38 +0000
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc: Tilman Schmidt <tilman@...p.cc>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, hidave.darkstar@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-ppp@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, paulus@...ba.org,
Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>,
Oliver Hartkopp <oliver@...tkopp.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Adjust softirq raising in __napi_schedule
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 08:44:14AM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 07:41 +0000, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
>
> > > netif_rx_ni() disables preemption.
> >
> > You wrote earlier:
> >
> > > [...] the networking layer needs to have
> > > packets handed to it with softirqs disabled.
> >
> > How disabling preemption can fix something which needs softirqs
> > disabled? Could you be more precise?
>
> No, I wrote that I didn't know. I suppose now that I looked at it I do
> know, and only disabling preemption is required.
But netif_rx has preemption disabled most of the time (by hardirqs
disabling). So maybe disabling preemption isn't the main reason here
either?
Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists